Quantcast
Channel: the charles smith blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8454

Bulletin: Roman Zadarov; Israel: Appeal rejected; Israeli Supreme Court: Roman Zadorov murdered Tair Rada Nine years after the murder that shocked the country, the case reached its peak when the judges announced that they are rejecting Zadarov’s appeal after he was already convicted twice, claiming that the proof that he committed the murder is beyond a reasonable doubt.

Next: Bulletin: Dennis Oland: New Brunswick; Provincial Police Commission to probe alleged police mishandling of the crime scene; "During his final instructions to the jury at the trial, Justice Jack Walsh reminding jurors that there was evidence that police didn't secure the scene from too many unncessary entries on July 7, 2011, as well, that officers used the washroom on the second-floor outside Richard Oland's office for two days, didn't make sure the back door to the alleyway was untouched until it was examined, and did not ask the pathologist if a drywall hammer could be the murder weapon." Also being investigated is an allegation that Deputy Chief Glen McCloskey - who has denied the allegation - suggested an officer lie about McCloskey being in the Far End Corporation office with the body of Richard Oland on July 7th 2011. The Bend.
Previous: Junk science writs: Why Ohio should follow the example of Texas and legislate a junk science writ. Scott Piepho; "A 2013 Texas law – the first of its kind – specifically allows a defendant to petition a court to overturn a conviction based on changes in the science that convicted him. The Texas law allows a defendant to file a petition – lawyers have adopted the term “junk science writ” – when he can show that admissible scientific evidence that was not available at trial and not ascertainable through the reasonable diligence of the defendant, undermines the proof of guilt. The evidence may consist of new tests that offer affirmative proof of innocence, but also evidence that shows that the scientific theory underlying the forensics that convicted him are now believed to be false. The law calls on courts to overturn any conviction when, in light of new evidence, the conviction cannot be sustained by a preponderance of the evidence. The Texas legislature has since amended the law to make it clear that it applies when an individual expert witness changes his or her position regarding testimony given in the defendant’s case. A similar law took effect in California earlier this year." The Akron Legal News; (Must, Must Read. HL);
$
0
0

"The Israeli Supreme Court 2 to 1 decided to reject Roman Zadarov’s appeal, after he was convicted twice of murdering a little girl named Tair Rada nine years ago while she was studying in school.  The position of one of the judges is that it may be that Zadorov’s guilt is not proven after many of those present explained that Zadorov is right. Zadarov’s lawyers explained their logic for submitting the request: “Can we give someone a life prison sentence when a Supreme Court judge says there are doubts about his conviction? We were disappointed of course. We expected that Roman would be acquitted.” In contrast, the Northern District Prosecution welcomed the decision: “Tools for hope ended in the Israeli Supreme Court.”
http://www.jerusalemonline.com/news/in-israel/local/israeli-supreme-court-roman-zadarov-murdered-tair-rada-17970

 From a recent post: "Forensic issues - and an allegation of interference with the independence of the Coroner's office - abound. "At the center of a long session that the Supreme Court held a little over a year ago on the appeal of Zadorov’s second conviction was the issue of footprints at the murder scene, a locked toilet stall in a second floor lavatory at the Nofei Golan school in Katzrin, including blood found on Rada’s jeans. According to an expert prosecution witness, there was a high probability that the footprints were those of Zadorov. For its part, however, the defense presented the opinion of a former employee of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation who claimed that the blood stains were not footprints at all. Recently, as disclosed by Haaretz, a complication arose in the case after the head of the commission that oversees the prosecutor’s office, retired Judge Hila Gerstl, issued a decision regarding an attempt to change an affidavit by the head of the coroner’s office, Dr. Chen Kugel, who expressed opposition to the state’s position in the Zadorov case. For her part, Gerstl said this constituted “apparent interference in the chief testimony of a witness” and ruled that the prosecutor’s office had mishandled the case.""
 http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2015/12/bulletin-roman-zadorov-israel-supreme.html

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8454

Trending Articles