Quantcast
Channel: the charles smith blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8454

Bulletin: Adnan Syed: Maryland; 'Serial' subject has day in court; His case for a new trial includes "newly scrutinized cellphone tower evidence." ..."In addition to McClain, Syed's attorneys said they would raise questions about cellphone evidence that linked Syed to the area where Lee was buried. The state plans to counter with an FBI cellphone expert." Reporter Justin Fenton: Baltimore Sun;

Previous: Bite-mark evidence: Consumate criminal justice blogger Radley Balko presents "The latest from the world of bite mark evidence" in his Washington Post column "The Watch" - including a case where a defence lawyer is relying on the disputed evidence: "On the one hand, if prosecutors are going to continue to use bite mark testimony, it doesn’t make much sense to ask defense attorneys to unilaterally disarm. On the other hand, it’s hard to see how a defense attorney could ethically submit evidence he or she knows is fraudulent. I obviously have no idea if the defense attorneys in this case honestly believe that bite mark analysis is scientifically valid. But they shouldn’t get any more deference than prosecutors. This case also is by no means the first time defense attorneys have tried to rely on bite mark analysis. In some ways, it seems worse when prosecutors deploy transparently bogus evidence because their obligation is to seek justice, not to win convictions at any cost. A defense attorney’s job is to vigorously defend his or her client, within a few basic ethical boundaries. The real problem is that we’ve entrusted judges to be the gatekeepers of science in the courtroom, and they’ve fulfilled that function about as well as you might expect from people trained in law, not science — pretty poorly. This sort of evidence ought to be rejected no matter which side is trying to introduce it." (Must Read. HL);
$
0
0

"'Serial' podcast subject Adnan Syed is in a Baltimore court house Wednesday, his attorney seeking a new trial. For more than a decade, Asia McClain was confident that she had seen Adnan Syed at a Woodlawn library during the time when prosecutors said he had killed his former girlfriend.
Defense attorneys never asked about her account, she said, and a prosecutor later dismissed the potential alibi as irrelevant. But before a packed courtroom on Wednesday, McClain described how a popular podcast about the case had persuaded her that she needed to speak up. "In order for justice to be served, all information has to be out on the table," McClain testified in Baltimore Circuit Court.
It was the first day of a three-day hearing. Syed's attorneys argued Wednesday that he should receive a new trial in the 1999 murder of his ex-girlfriend and Woodlawn High School classmate Hae Min Lee. The hearing was the first since the "Serial" podcast raised questions about Syed's conviction.........Syed's attorneys say McClain's account should not have been dismissed. They say her testimony and newly scrutinized cellphone tower evidence provide grounds for a new trial......... Vignarajah said in his opening remarks that the trial prosecutors presented overwhelming evidence, including forensics and evidence that pointed to a motive of Syed being possessive of Lee. In addition to McClain, Syed's attorneys said they would raise questions about cellphone evidence that linked Syed to the area where Lee was buried. The state plans to counter with an FBI cellphone expert. It is not known whether Welch will issue his ruling at the conclusion of the hearing or at a later date."


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8454

Trending Articles