Quantcast
Channel: the charles smith blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8447

Bulletin: David Eastman; Australia; Stay application (6): The Canberra Times reports that Commonwealth prosecutors say they have no record of ever having known of concerns about the reliability of a top FBI examiner who helped bolster the forensic case against David Eastman...."FBI unit chief Roger Martz gave evidence in the 1995 trial of Mr Eastman for the murder of Assistant Federal Police Commissioner Colin Stanley Winchester in 1989. Mr Martz, who worked on some of the United States' most important terrorism cases in the 1990s, helped verify the work of a Victorian forensic expert, Robert Barnes, who used now-discredited gunshot residue analysis to link Mr Eastman to the murder scene. But it recently emerged that the US government, acting on a tip from an FBI whistleblower, began investigating Mr Martz and a group of his colleagues at the FBI Laboratory for misconduct and flawed work less than a year after Mr Eastman's trial. The final report, delivered in 1997, found Mr Martz was lacking in credibility, objectivity, and competence, recommending that he be found a spot outside the laboratory." Reporter Christopher Knaus.

Next: Bulletin: Editorial: Concord Monitor (New Hampshire) editorial notes that evidence is "mounting" against the death penalty - and zeroes in on the Kevin Cooper case. ..."Cooper has been on death row in California since 1985, after he was found guilty of murdering Douglas and Peggy Ryen, their 10-year-old daughter, Jessica, and 10-year-old Chris Hughes in Chino Hills. It was a brutal crime. According to a lengthy NBC News report last month, the victims received more than 144 wounds in four minutes. The one survivor, 8-year-old Josh Ryen, had his throat slit. Although Josh would later point the finger at Cooper, a black man, he initially told police that three white or Latino men murdered his parents, according to NBC. Other witnesses spotted three white men driving away from the house in the family’s stolen station wagon. And a woman called police to say that on the night of the murders she found her husband’s coveralls splattered with blood. He was a white man and convicted murderer. The police never tested the blood on the coveralls, NBC reported, and instead discarded them in a dumpster. As sometimes happens, the police had their man and any evidence that didn’t fit that narrative was discarded. So Cooper was sentenced to be executed on Feb. 10, 2004."..."Cooper is black. He is poor. He was on the run from police – and hiding out in a house near the crime scene – when the murders happened. If Cooper is indeed innocent, as several federal judges have suggested, it has all the makings of a Kafkaesque nightmare. One of these years, New Hampshire lawmakers will wake up and realize that to take one innocent life is to take one too many, and so will abolish the death penalty."
Previous: Bite-mark evidence: BBC News observes that, "A Texas forensic science commission has recommended that bite mark evidence should no longer be admitted in court cases" - and asks "How accurate is the science?"..."It's unprecedented in the history of forensic science," says M Chris Fabricant, director of strategic litigation at the Innocence Project, which has been instrumental in calling the technique into question. "[Bite mark evidence] resulted in thousands of convictions, and at least 24 wrongful convictions and indictments."..."The commission will now begin auditing every bite mark conviction obtained by the state of Texas in the last ten years, including the case of David Spence. "It's going to be an enormous undertaking that the Innocence Project will assist with," says Fabricant. "It should have stopped dozens of years ago, unless and until it can be scientifically validated." (Must, Must Read. HL);
$
0
0
 
"Commonwealth prosecutors say they have no record of ever having known of concerns about the reliability of a top FBI examiner who helped bolster the forensic case against David Eastman. FBI unit chief Roger Martz gave evidence in the 1995 trial of Mr Eastman for the murder of Assistant Federal Police Commissioner Colin Stanley Winchester in 1989. Mr Martz, who worked on some of the United States' most important terrorism cases in the 1990s, helped verify the work of a Victorian forensic expert, Robert Barnes, who used now-discredited gunshot residue analysis to link Mr Eastman to the murder scene. But it recently emerged that the US government, acting on a tip from an FBI whistleblower, began investigating Mr Martz and a group of his colleagues at the FBI Laboratory for misconduct and flawed work less than a year after Mr Eastman's trial. The final report, delivered in 1997, found Mr Martz was lacking in credibility, objectivity, and competence, recommending that he be found a spot outside the laboratory. His work on the Eastman case was later reviewed specifically, and was found to be done in a scientifically acceptable manner. Mr Eastman's legal team never knew of concerns about Mr Martz's credibility. They are now trying to find out who knew of the 1997 report, and when."

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8447

Trending Articles