Quantcast
Channel: the charles smith blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8450

Richard Eikelenboom: Colorado; Bulletin: The DNA expert takes the offensive after being discredited prosecutor in a Denver trial - and disputes the allegations..."They're lying when they say I don’t do my own DNA work," Eikelenboom told Denver7. He said being on the witness stand Monday was a "very hostile environment" and that the "lawyers were not able to explain it [his work]." Eikelenboom said he's been accredited by the Dutch National Accreditation Council for years and Monday, he received accreditation by the American Society of Crime Lab Directors (ASCLD). "I would not get that if I was not a solid scientist," Eikelenboom told Denver7. Testimony this week in a 2013 sex assault case in Denver District Court found that Eikelenboom committed "fundamental DNA analysis errors by not following scientific standards in the DNA field," prosecutors said. "[That's] completely unfounded," Eikelenboom said. "What I think also went wrong, the lawyers we were working for were not well prepared. The District Attorney never let me finish my answer."

Next: Chris Tapp: (Idaho; (1); Report commissioned by prosecutors on the 1997 murder conviction of Chris Tapp in the killing of Angie Dodge concludes Tapp's confession was “either tainted, questionable or unlikely' - but draws criticism from the victim's mother, a former FBI agent, and the co-founder of 'Judges for Justice' for its conclusion that Tapp was a witness to the crime. Former FBI Supervisory Special Agent Steve Moore, who headed up terrorism investigations at the FBI field office in Los Angeles in addition to investigating murders in Indian country and by the Aryan Nations, reviewed the same statements and came to the opposite conclusion. Dodge commonly wore sweats, Moore wrote in his original report, and Tapp knew her so it is likely he had seen her wear sweatpants before. Moore also pointed out that Tapp was incorrect when he stated the color of the sweatpants. “My assessment of that evidence is discussed in detail in the report,” Moore said in an interview. “His opinion has not moved my conclusion a nanometer. I stand by everything I said.” Robinson’s report takes issue with Moore’s on numerous points, mainly his analysis of the physical evidence at the scene. Retired Judge Mike Heavey, co-founder of Judges for Justice, said he found the report “contradictory” and “underwhelming.” “The conclusions are not supported by any credible evidence that Chris Tapp was present in that room,” he said. Carol Dodge, Angie Dodge’s mother, found that equally unconvincing. She pointed out that Angie’s body was found by co-workers at Beauty for All Seasons, who had seen her clothing. And Angie was visited by several of her friends the night of her murder, who also would have seen her clothing, she said. What Angie was wearing had become common knowledge, she said. Dodge met with Prosecutor Danny Clark ahead of the report’s public release. “I begged him to set Chris Tapp free,” she said in an interview. And she fears that the report won’t be enough to make that happen."
$
0
0

"A forensic scientist who has claimed to be a DNA expert in trials in Colorado and across the United States was discredited this week in a Denver trial, according to the Denver District Attorney's Office. However, Richard Eikelenboom disputes that claim. "A Denver prosecutor got Eikelenboom to admit that he had no direct DNA extraction or analysis experience, that he operates a lab that has not been accredited, that he personally failed his basic proficiency texts in 2011 and 2012, and admitted that he was a 'self-trained' in running DNA profiles," the DA's office said. "They're lying when they say I don’t do my own DNA work," Eikelenboom told Denver7. He said being on the witness stand Monday was a "very hostile environment" and that the "lawyers were not able to explain it [his work]." Eikelenboom said he's been accredited by the Dutch National Accreditation Council for years and Monday, he received accreditation by the American Society of Crime Lab Directors (ASCLD). "I would not get that if I was not a solid scientist," Eikelenboom told Denver7. Testimony this week in a 2013 sex assault case in Denver District Court found that Eikelenboom committed "fundamental DNA analysis errors by not following scientific standards in the DNA field," prosecutors said. "[That's] completely unfounded," Eikelenboom said. "What I think also went wrong, the lawyers we were working for were not well prepared. The District Attorney never let me finish my answer.""I appreciate Judge Whitney recognizing that Mr. Eikelenboom’s opinions about DNA have no basis in science and that he was not qualified to testify as an expert," said Denver District Attorney Mitch Morrissey in a statement sent to Denver7. "[This is a] weird system. As District Attorney, you can say all kinds of things about the expert," Eikelenboom told Denver7. "I don’t think the judge completely understood what happened." Eikelenboom has been used as an expert witness in high-profile cases, including the trial of Casey Anthony, who was acquitted in 2011 of killing her 3-year-old daughter in Florida. Eikelenboom testified in the trial of Indiana State Trooper David Camm, who was accused of killing his wife and two children. Camm was convicted twice, but the verdicts were overturned. In the third trial, Eikelenboom testified that he found someone else's DNA on the clothing of two victims and Camm was acquitted. Eikelenboom's testing and testimony led to a Colorado man being exonerated in a murder case after spending years behind bars.........Eikelenboom's wife, Selma, started the private lab in the Netherlands in 2003 called Independent Forensic Services. Richard joined the company in 2005, he said. The company's website says Richard Eikelenboom is a forensic scientist specializing in DNA trace recovery and bloodstain pattern analysis. It says he studied analytical chemistry and Polytechnic Biochemistry. It said he is studying for his PhD on touch DNA at the University of Denver. In 2011, the Eikelenboom's built a lab in Jefferson County."

The entire story can be found at:

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/front-range/denver/dna-expert-richard-eikelenboom-admits-he-has-no-direct-dna-or-analysis-experience

See the related CBS: story at the link below: " A man who has testified in several high-profile criminal trials around the country as a DNA expert has been discredited in a Denver trial. Richard Eikelenboom says it’s almost expected that his qualifications would be called into question by attorneys, but he calls what happened on the stand in Denver ludicrous. “What happens here is not truth finding. They just want to find something to throw mud at you,” Eikelenboom told CBS4.

 http://denver.cbslocal.com/2016/09/02/man-who-testified-as-dna-expert-defends-his-reputation/


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8450

Trending Articles