Quantcast
Channel: the charles smith blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8448

Annie Dookhan: Massachusetts; White Elephant case; Supreme Judicial Court hears arguments on fate of 24,000 cases linked to Annie Dookhan...“Stepping up to solve a mess created by the commonwealth ... would be a bailout for the commonwealth,” said Matthew Segal, legal director of the ACLU of Massachusetts. Public defenders, the ACLU and prosecutors all agreed that a major portion of the defendants involved in the 24,000 cases have already served their sentences. But ACLU attorneys argued that the convictions have long-lasting effects on people - including some who may face deportation proceedings." Reporter Bob McGovern; Boston Herald.

Next: Rene bailey: New York: Shaken baby syndrome; For the first time, a New York appellate court has ruled that evidence once used to convict people in shaken-baby cases may no longer be scientifically valid. The Democrat and Chronicle reports..."The appeals court decision, released Thursday, changes the legal landscape in New York for alleged shaken baby cases, said Brian Shiffrin, a local appellate lawyer who was not involved in the case. “It makes it both easier for defense attorneys to argue the science and it puts the burden back on prosecutors to show there is evidence to support the theory of shaken baby syndrome,” said Shiffrin, who has handled appeals of shaken-baby convictions."..."Bailey, now 56, had been in state prison about nine years when a volunteer lawyer offered to take up her case. The lawyer, Adele Bernhard, was director of a law clinic for indigent defendants at Pace University in Westchester County. Bernhard argued that over the previous decade, research had revealed other explanations for the sort of internal injuries once ascribed solely to shaking a baby. An accidental fall or an illness could instead cause the injuries, a growing number of scientists and physicians had come to believe. Bailey had insisted to police and prosecutors that the child at her home day care, Brittney Sheets, had jumped or fallen from an 18-inch-high chair and struck her head while Bailey was out of the room. At her trial, Bailey's assertion was overridden by medical testimony that the caregiver must have violently shaken the child. Bernhard argued that there now were scientific findings that a fall could have caused Brittney's injuries. This latest science, she said, should be considered newly discovered evidence, which can be grounds to reverse a conviction and order a new trial."...:"Bernhard, who now is at New York Law School in Manhattan, agreed Tuesday that this was the first appeals case in New York that had concluded new scientific findings about shaken-baby injuries constituted the type of newly discovered evidence that could overturn a conviction."
$
0
0
 

Image result for "white elephant"

In the years since I started publishing this Blog I have become increasingly disturbed by the 'white elephant' in the room: Sheer, unadulterated, willful   misconduct in the criminal justice system - much  of it involving forensic evidence - committed by lab technicians,  pathologists, police officers, prosecutors and others.  Think Annie Dookhan; Think Sonia Farak; Think David Kofoed; Think Charles Smith; Think Ken Anderson; Think Gene Morrison. Think Michael West;   I have therefore decided to run this image of a white elephant at the top of every applicable post henceforth, to draw our reader's attention to   what I see as a major problem in all too many criminal justice system's - my own included.  Harold Levy; Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
"Reformers have for years recommended that all forensic labs be independent from law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies' and this is a key reform promoted by The Justice Project (2008). But fixing these problems is only half the answer' because half of the wrongful convictions attributed to misleading forensic evidence involved deliberate forensic fraud' evidence tampering' and/or perjury.
From "The Elephant in the Crime Lab," by co-authored by Sheila Berry and Larry Ytuarte; Forensic Examiner; Spring, 2009;

-------------------------------------------

STORY: "Prosecutors, defense spar in battle over 24,000 potentially tainted cases," by reporter Bob McGovern, published by The Boston Herald on November 16, 2016.
 
SUB-HEADING:  "SJC Hears Arguments On Fate Of 24,000 Cases Linked To Criminal Chemist."

PHOTO CAPTION:  "Vincent DeMore argues that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court should not vacate the cases of about 20,000 defendants that could have been wrongfully convicted based on evidence tainted by Annie Dookhan."

GIST: "Public defenders and civil rights attorneys today argued the state’s highest court should dismiss approximately 24,000 potentially tainted cases — marking the latest round of the long-running brawl over disgraced state chemist Annie Dookhan. “(Prosecutors) have failed to step up,” said Benjamin Keehn for the state public defenders, adding later: “It is time for this court to order a remedy that actually restores the integrity of the system.” Prosecutors, meanwhile, argued that a case-by-case approach is a better way to handle the problem and that throwing out thousands of cases would an affront to the criminal process.........Public defenders have raised the specter of thousands of indigent “Dookhan defendants” challenging to their convictions — a prospect that also drew concerns from Chief Justice Ralph Gants, . “This is a practical problem,” Gants said, pressing prosecutors to explain what public defenders — or judges — are supposed to do if the courts are suddenly hit by a wave of defendants. “How can we not address that? Doesn’t that have to be part of what we’re addressing?” Prosecutors shot back, arguing that the issue was pure speculation and if it arises, public defenders could “go to the legislature” to ask for funds or come back to the Supreme Judicial Court. “Do we just dismiss cases because it’s hard?” O’Neil said, when asked about the potential burden facing the system. Justice David Lowy posed a similar question to the ACLU, asking why it didn’t think Massachusetts attorneys would “step up” to the challenge of sorting through the Dookhan mess on a case-by-case basis. “Stepping up to solve a mess created by the commonwealth ... would be a bailout for the commonwealth,” said Matthew Segal, legal director of the ACLU of Massachusetts. Public defenders, the ACLU and prosecutors all agreed that a major portion of the defendants involved in the 24,000 cases have already served their sentences. But ACLU attorneys argued that the convictions have long-lasting effects on people - including some who may face deportation proceedings.........Dookhan has already completed a three-year prison sentence for tampering with evidence and falsifying drug tests in criminal cases."

The entire story can be found at:
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2016/11/prosecutors_defense_spar_in_battle_over_24000_potentially_tainted_cases
 
PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:  http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog. 

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8448

Trending Articles