Quantcast
Channel: the charles smith blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8450

Chris Tapp: Idaho; False confession case; Bulletin; A mixed victory on his application for post-conviction relief: But Post Register reporter Bryan Clark reports (December 8, 2016) "Importantly, Stephens’ ruling allows the challenge to focus on whether police used the polygraph “to psychologically coerce, manipulate and trick (Tapp) into a false confession.” That has been the key finding of numerous outside experts who have reviewed the case, including false confession experts, retired FBI supervisory special agents and polygraph experts."..."The second issue is whether Tapp can present new evidence that he was coerced into confessing. This evidence is likely to include tapes of the interrogations themselves, along with the testimony of expert witnesses. “The seven polygraph videos have not previously been seen or heard by any court,” Thomas argued in an earlier filing. “They show the police employing extreme psychological coercion on Chris Tapp. They show how they coerced and tricked Tapp into changing his story five times.” An earlier witness list submitted by Thomas includes retired Judge Mike Heavey, co-founder of Judges for Justice, Boise State University polygraph expert Charles Honts, retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent Gregg McCrary and Professor Steve Drizin, legal director of the Center for Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University. Stephens’ ruling is a blow to the first cause, while leaving the second issue open to move forward in its entirety."..."The next step in pursuing the new evidence claim is likely to be an evidentiary hearing, at which expert testimony and evidence will be presented to Stephens for review. There will be a status conference on the petition Tuesday."

Next: Jailhouse snitches: (Part 1): Edward George McGregor: Texas; White Elephant case? Prosecutor Elizabeth Shipley Exley; White Elephant Case?.. "A Fort Bend County Judge has upheld complaints of prosecutorial misconduct against a Harris County prosecutor who lied to a jury in a capital murder trial about whether she had struck deals with three jailhouse snitches in exchange for their testimony," The Houston Press (reporter Meagan Flynn) reports..."Her reason for believing she didn't need to disclose that to the jury, the defense or even her Fort Bend co-counsel when she was asked if deals were made? “I didn't say specifically that I would do it; it wasn't a promise.” But Shipley Exley did do it, and admitted that midway through the trial, Gable even sent her a note telling her what to write in the letter to the parole board. Five days after McGregor was convicted, largely thanks to Gable's testimony, Shipley Exley followed through on her non-promise and mailed the letter. Asked why she never mentioned the conversation she had with Gable during the trial, Shipley Exley said, “I think I forgot.” Schaffer, McGregor's attorney, described Shipley Exley's actions as shameful. “They've got a witness who will crawl out of the penitentiary, say the story they want to hear — that she heard a confession 16 years ago that she's never told anybody about until now — and you're willing to accept that story and put it on as true without doing anything to check it out?” Schaffer said. “The whole thing was a sham, and [Shipley Exley] didn't even care.” Then there are the two other jailhouse snitches who received massive reductions in punishment because of their contributions to this capital murder trial, courtesy of Shipley Exley. Both men, Marvin Roy Paxton and Adam Osani, were awaiting trial in the Harris County Jail for an aggravated robbery and felony assault of a family member, respectively."
Previous: Flawed Forensics: Georgia State University Dean Jessica Gabel Cino observes that 'forensic science is largely not supported by sound science' - and asks 'now what?'..." As it’s risen to ubiquitous celebrity status, forensic science has become shrouded in a cloak of infallibility and certainty in the public’s imagination. It seems to provide definitive answers. Forensics feels scientific and impartial as a courtroom weighs a defendant’s possible guilt – looking for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. But the faith the public and the criminal justice system place in forensic science far outpaces the amount of trust it deserves."..."When forensic methods are not validated but nevertheless perceived as reliable, wrongful convictions happen. For example, the field of forensic odontology presumes that everyone has a unique bite mark. But there’s no scientific basis for this assumption."..." Reliance upon the adversary system to prevent wrongful convictions and weed out junk science requires a leap of faith that ultimately undermines the integrity of the criminal justice system. Counting on cross examination as an effective substitute for scientific rigor and research can’t be the answer (although it has been for more than a century)."Dean JesForensic evidence largely not supported by sound science – now what?
$
0
0

"Judge Alan Stephens has dismissed part of one of Chris Tapp’s petitions for post-conviction relief, while allowing other parts to move forward. While Thursday’s ruling is mixed, it leaves Tapp an avenue to mount a substantive challenge to his conviction for the 1996 murder of 18-year-old Angie Dodge. The decision came the same day Bonneville County Prosecutor Danny Clark released the findings of his review of the Tapp conviction. Clark does not believe there is clear and convincing evidence of Tapp’s innocence, so he will not move for the conviction to be vacated or for a new trial. The Post Register will report in detail on Clark’s findings this weekend. Importantly, Stephens’ ruling allows the challenge to focus on whether police used the polygraph “to psychologically coerce, manipulate and trick (Tapp) into a false confession.” That has been the key finding of numerous outside experts who have reviewed the case, including false confession experts, retired FBI supervisory special agents and polygraph experts. The petition before the court involves two issues. The first is whether prosecutors failed to turn over video tapes of certain polygraph and interrogations sessions at which Tapp alleges he was psychologically coerced into a confession which had left him locked up for nearly half his life. This claim is called a “Brady violation” after the U.S. Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, which held that prosecutors have an obligation to turn over all evidence which tends to show a defendant isn’t guilty. That claim suffered a significant blow when some of the tapes allegedly withheld subsequently turned up in files at the State Appellate Public Defender’s Office.........The second issue is whether Tapp can present new evidence that he was coerced into confessing. This evidence is likely to include tapes of the interrogations themselves, along with the testimony of expert witnesses. “The seven polygraph videos have not previously been seen or heard by any court,” Thomas argued in an earlier filing. “They show the police employing extreme psychological coercion on Chris Tapp. They show how they coerced and tricked Tapp into changing his story five times.” An earlier witness list submitted by Thomas includes retired Judge Mike Heavey, co-founder of Judges for Justice, Boise State University polygraph expert Charles Honts, retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent Gregg McCrary and Professor Steve Drizin, legal director of the Center for Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University. Stephens’ ruling is a blow to the first cause, while leaving the second issue open to move forward in its entirety. “The court views these causes of action to be separate, and its decision regarding the Brady violation does not dispose of any part of the other cause of action,” Stephens wrote."
http://www.postregister.com/articles/chris-tapp-coverage-news-daily-email-todays-headlines/2016/12/08/tapp-appeal-advances#

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8450

Trending Articles