STORY: "This Chicago Man Was Sentenced To Life On A Faulty Arson Conviction — Now He’s Getting Out," by reporter Mike Hayes, published by BuzzFeed on May 3, 2017.
PHOTO CAPTION: "Adam Gray was convicted of arson and murder and sentenced to life in prison after police used bad fire science. Now, more than 24 years later, the charges are being dropped and he’s being freed."
GIST: "A Chicago man convicted as a teenager of double-murder and arson and sentenced to life in prison without parole will have his conviction vacated and — after more than 24 years behind bars — will walk out of prison Wednesday night. Adam Gray, 39, was the subject of a BuzzFeed News story last year titled Making An Arsonist that reported on the debunked fire science used to convict him after he was arrested in 1993. Last year, Gray’s petition for a new trial in the case was denied— but now a ruling by the Appellate Court of Illinois on a joint motion to drop the indictment against him will make Gray a free man. “Following a thorough, independent investigation, the Cook County State’s Attorney has concluded that Mr. Gray’s 1996 convictions were based on flawed trial testimony from purported experts in the field of fire investigation and are no longer valid,” the joint motion reads. “Scientific advances since the time of trial have proven that the fire investigators’ testimonies — while based on beliefs that were widely held in 1996 — were erroneous under current scientific knowledge,” the motion continues. The motion also decried the Circuit Court’s decision last November to not grant Gray a new trial, calling it “extraordinary and unprecedented. Adam Gray was arrested in 1993 at age 14 and accused of setting his ex-girlfriend’s house on the Southside of Chicago on fire. Two elderly people living on the second floor died in the blaze. Three years later, he was tried as an adult and found guilty of double-murder — a charge that, at the time, carried an automatic sentence of life without parole even though the 17-year-old Gray was still technically a juvenile. Gray has always professed his innocence, saying the confession he gave the day of the fire was coerced by police who interrogated him for hours without a lawyer or his parents present.
In 2016, Gray’s defense team and prosecutors for the State of Illinois agreed that he should get a new trial because of emerging science that suggests detectives ruled the fire an arson based on investigative techniques that have been thoroughly discredited over the years. Prosecutors from the Cook County conviction integrity unit wrote in a motion in June — joining Gray’s request for a new trial — that arson investigators who testified against him in 1996 relied on “abandoned theories” in the field. Furthermore, the prosecution added that the fire science used to convict Gray has become “partially invalidated” in the years since his conviction. At the June 2016 hearing, Assistant State’s Attorney Celeste Stack said on the new fire science evidence, “I think it is enough to go forward” with a new trial, adding, “I think that Mr. Gray will be convicted a second time around.” But in Nov. 2016, Cook County Circuit Court Judge Angela Petrone ruled that evidence submitted to her “failed to present conclusive evidence of his actual innocence, or any evidence that is of such conclusive nature that it would probably change the result at retrial.” After taking office, new Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx revisited Gray’s case, paving the way for this week’s decision to drop the indictment against him. BuzzFeed News has reached out to Foxx’s office for comment.........Gray’s efforts to appeal his case proved hopeless for years. Then in 2010, attorneys from Chicago-based firm Jenner & Block and the University of Chicago Law School Exoneration Project took up his case and brought in three leading experts in the field of fire science: John Lentini, Denny Smith, and Gerald Hurst. They examined dozens of photographs, chemical tests from the debris and milk jug, police reports, and testimony from the trial. Hurst said during his deposition that he put in 100 to 200 hours looking at the photos alone. In a report, the experts said that the claim that a liquid accelerant was present based on alligator charring was “speculative and not supported by any evidence or scientific research.” Smith wrote that after investigators failed to find gasoline at the scene, they relied on an “absence of evidence” and the elimination of other accidental causes, such as electrical. He called the methodology “unacceptable, unethical, and improper.” The motion to vacate Gray’s sentence addressed the fire expert testimony against Gray: “That testimony reflected beliefs that were widely accepted at the time of Mr. Gray’s trial. But subsequent years have seen a sea change in the field of fire investigation, in which new scientific studies and technologies have caused fire investigators to realize that many of their old beliefs were incorrect.” The motion notes that in particular advances in science have “conclusively disproven” that the presence of charred wood indicates the use of an accelerant." Making An Arsonist
The entire story can be found at:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/mikehayes/adam-gray-getting-out-of-prison?utm_term=.lrorLZBAr#.whP2mdpR2
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/
In 2016, Gray’s defense team and prosecutors for the State of Illinois agreed that he should get a new trial because of emerging science that suggests detectives ruled the fire an arson based on investigative techniques that have been thoroughly discredited over the years. Prosecutors from the Cook County conviction integrity unit wrote in a motion in June — joining Gray’s request for a new trial — that arson investigators who testified against him in 1996 relied on “abandoned theories” in the field. Furthermore, the prosecution added that the fire science used to convict Gray has become “partially invalidated” in the years since his conviction. At the June 2016 hearing, Assistant State’s Attorney Celeste Stack said on the new fire science evidence, “I think it is enough to go forward” with a new trial, adding, “I think that Mr. Gray will be convicted a second time around.” But in Nov. 2016, Cook County Circuit Court Judge Angela Petrone ruled that evidence submitted to her “failed to present conclusive evidence of his actual innocence, or any evidence that is of such conclusive nature that it would probably change the result at retrial.” After taking office, new Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx revisited Gray’s case, paving the way for this week’s decision to drop the indictment against him. BuzzFeed News has reached out to Foxx’s office for comment.........Gray’s efforts to appeal his case proved hopeless for years. Then in 2010, attorneys from Chicago-based firm Jenner & Block and the University of Chicago Law School Exoneration Project took up his case and brought in three leading experts in the field of fire science: John Lentini, Denny Smith, and Gerald Hurst. They examined dozens of photographs, chemical tests from the debris and milk jug, police reports, and testimony from the trial. Hurst said during his deposition that he put in 100 to 200 hours looking at the photos alone. In a report, the experts said that the claim that a liquid accelerant was present based on alligator charring was “speculative and not supported by any evidence or scientific research.” Smith wrote that after investigators failed to find gasoline at the scene, they relied on an “absence of evidence” and the elimination of other accidental causes, such as electrical. He called the methodology “unacceptable, unethical, and improper.” The motion to vacate Gray’s sentence addressed the fire expert testimony against Gray: “That testimony reflected beliefs that were widely accepted at the time of Mr. Gray’s trial. But subsequent years have seen a sea change in the field of fire investigation, in which new scientific studies and technologies have caused fire investigators to realize that many of their old beliefs were incorrect.” The motion notes that in particular advances in science have “conclusively disproven” that the presence of charred wood indicates the use of an accelerant." Making An Arsonist
The entire story can be found at:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/mikehayes/adam-gray-getting-out-of-prison?utm_term=.lrorLZBAr#.whP2mdpR2
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/