Quantcast
Channel: the charles smith blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8450

Rodricus Crawford: Louisiana; Civil lawsuit launched by former death row inmate aims at examining what went wrong in the case - and instituting checks and balances to ensure such an injustice never happens again..."Those checks and balances were severely lacking when a Caddo District Court jury handed down the capital punishment sentence the following year against the Shreveport man in the 2012 death of his 1-year-old son Roderius "Bobo" Lott, according to Crawford's lawsuit. "Mr. Crawford was convicted and sentenced to death based upon false evidence as a result of the failure of Defendants to conduct an unbiased autopsy based on professional standards of practice, and to properly train and supervise prosecutors in Caddo Parish," said the lawsuit filed Nov. 16 in U.S. District Court for Louisiana's Western District. "Because of the lack of training and supervision and adherence to professional standards, the prosecution was illegally based upon both race and religion, and a complete indifference to the evidence. In addition, Mr. Crawford raises state law negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims; but for the reckless and willful conduct of defendants, Mr. Crawford would not have been prosecuted let alone convicted of capital murder." Legacy?Shreveport man freed from death row files suit in hopes 'injustice never happens again'; Karen Kidd; December 5; 2017.

Next: Disgraced Hospital for Sick Children now-defunct Motherisk hair testing lab: Ontario: Court of appeal ruling all but ends hope for parents in (Hospital for Sick Children) 'Motherisk' case; Toronto Star investigative reporter Rachel Mendleson; "For the parents in a hard-fought Motherisk case that has highlighted cracks in the child welfare system related to the treatment of Indigenous families, the effect of delay and the reliance on flawed forensic evidence, hope of regaining access to their 10-year-old daughter has been all but extinguished. The Court of Appeal has overturned a decision that reopened the possibility of continued contact with the child, who has languished in legal limbo since she was apprehended in 2012, when her mother failed a flawed drug test from the Hospital for Sick Children’s Motherisk lab. In a decision released on Friday, the Court of Appeal found Superior Court Justice Grant A. Campbell, who heard the first appeal in Kitchener, was wrong to overturn the trial judge’s “no access” order and “erred in his consideration of the child’s Indigenous heritage.” The parents say they plan to seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. “I want to be in her life. I want to be the influence. I want to be the protector of that child,” the father, who is identified by his initials, J.B., to protect his daughter’s identity, told the Star. Says the mother, C.T.: “I’m not giving up. I’ll never give up. She knows that we love her and she knows what we have.” The mother is among at least 25,000 people across Canada whose hair was tested by Motherisk before the lab was closed in 2015 and a government-commissioned review deemed the results “inadequate and unreliable” for use in court. The faulty results influenced thousands of decisions to remove children from their families in ways that are difficult to untangle and often impossible to reverse, as the Star has reported."
Previous: Question of the day: Journalist Ted Gest asks: "Does evidence matter in judicial policy making? (One would think this would be a no-brainer - but read on! HL)..." Laurie Robinson, former Assistant U.S. Attorney General now on the faculty of George Mason University, believes there has been much progress but also a lot of resistance to the idea of backing up justice policy with solid research. In the first of two Robinson stints at DOJ, a report assessing what works in fighting crime and what doesn’t helped her cut federal funding for programs like Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) and military-style boot camps for low-level offenders. Still, dubious ideas like gun buy-backs by police agencies keep recurring even though studies have found them ineffective. “Science has a hard time combatting emotionally popular programs,” Robinson said during a panel discussing the topic. Edward Mulvey of the University of Pittsburgh, who heads a Science Advisory Board at DOJ, agreed that evidence on the spread of evidence-based programs is mixed. Many “unsound policies” remain in the criminal justice world, partly because much of the public doesn’t see the value of waiting for evidence to justify a policy change, Mulvey said."..."One leading justice practitioner who agreed that it can be difficult to instill evidentiary principles in the work of police and other criminal justice workers was Gil Kerlikowske, a former Seattle police chief and director of National Drug Policy under President Obama. Kerlikowske noted that many large police departments had improved their techniques in such areas as videotaping confessions and obtaining witness identifications of crime suspects, but that many smaller departments had not caught up with needed changes."
$
0
0

STORY: 'Shreveport man freed from death row files suit in hopes 'injustice never happens again', by reporter Karen Kidd, published by The Louisiana Record on December 5, 3017.


GIST: The lawsuit filed by former death row inmate Rodricus Crawford is about more than justice for Crawford; it's about getting Caddo Parish officials to change their death-penalty-dealing ways, one of the now-freed man's attorneys said during a recent interview. "Rodricus seeks justice not only for himself and for all that he lost, but also for people who might - God forbid - face similar circumstances," Crawford's attorney David J. Utter, counsel with The Claiborne Firm in Savannah, Georgia, said during a Louisiana Record email interview. "This lawsuit provides parish and city officials do the right thing by examining what went wrong in Rodricus’ case, and instituting checks and balances to ensure such an injustice never happens again. Rodricus Crawford's attorney David J. Utter of The Claiborne Firm in Savannah, Georgia | Photo courtesy of David J. Utter. Those checks and balances were severely lacking when a Caddo District Court jury handed down the capital punishment sentence the following year against the Shreveport man in the 2012 death of his 1-year-old son Roderius "Bobo" Lott, according to Crawford's lawsuit. "Mr. Crawford was convicted and sentenced to death based upon false evidence as a result of the failure of Defendants to conduct an unbiased autopsy based on professional standards of practice, and to properly train and supervise prosecutors in Caddo Parish," said the lawsuit filed Nov. 16 in U.S. District Court for Louisiana's Western District. "Because of the lack of training and supervision and adherence to professional standards, the prosecution was illegally based upon both race and religion, and a complete indifference to the evidence. In addition, Mr. Crawford raises state law negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims; but for the reckless and willful conduct of defendants, Mr. Crawford would not have been prosecuted let alone convicted of capital murder." In his lawsuit filed on behalf of himself and his minor daughter, Crawford claims he did not receive his constitutionally guaranteed right to a fair trial. Named defendants in the case include Caddo Parish Coroner's Office, Caddo Parish District Attorney's Office, Caddo Parish District Attorney James Stewart, former Caddo Parish District Attorney Dale Cox, Shreveport Fire Department and Coroner James Traylor. Crawford's lawsuit asks for a jury trial. The Caddo Parish District Attorney's office did not respond to a Louisiana Record request for comment. "Defendants knowingly participated in the investigation, arrest and capital prosecution driven by Caddo Parish, Louisiana's well-known history of racism and the arbitrary application of the death penalty," Crawford's lawsuit said. "But for Defendants’ actions, no prosecution and conviction of Mr. Crawford would have occurred." Crawford was taken into custody after bruises and other injuries were discovered on the child's body. Crawford reportedly told police his son had fallen in the bathroom and Crawford consistently maintained that he had never harmed his son. His attorneys also consistently maintained that the jury relied on bad forensic science, and pointed to strong medical evidence that the child was suffering from pneumonia and died of sepsis. "The conduct of the officials in this case, particularly the coroner Dr. Traylor and the prosecutor, were particularly egregious, outside the norm of a mistake or error," Utter said. "There was intentional misconduct." By the time Crawford's conviction was overturned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in November 2016, Caddo Parish juries were widely noted for having sentenced five people to death in six years, 38 percent of the state's total death sentences. The state's highest court ordered a new trial for Crawford after finding serious issues with the case, including unconstitutional exclusion of black jurors. Louisiana prosecutors dropped charges against Crawford this past April and he was freed soon after that. "As the result of Defendants' unconstitutional, negligent and intentional acts, Mr. Crawford spent 4 years, 9 months, and 6 days illegally in custody," Crawford's lawsuit said.
Utter credited Baton Rouge lawyer Cecilia Trenticosta Kappel, his co-counsel in Crawford's lawsuit who is active with the Capital Appeals Project and the Promise of Justice Initiative, for much of the work done to exonerate Crawford. "Cecelia is the real hero amongst the lawyers on the case," Utter said. Crawford's lawsuit is necessary to get defendants and others to do the right thing, Utter said.
"Unfortunately, many innocent people who spent time in jail or prison have to file a lawsuit before officials will do what is right," Utter said, referring to the overturned murder conviction of Sabein Burgess in Maryland. "Rodricus only filed because the officials responsible for this miscarriage of justice failed to apologize and offer to discuss a settlement that provided justice to him, his family and ensure something like this never happens again in Shreveport," Utter said."

The entire story can be found at:
https://louisianarecord.com/stories/511281838-shreveport-man-freed-from-death-row-files-suit-in-hopes-injustice-never-happens-again



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8450

Trending Articles