Quantcast
Viewing latest article 17
Browse Latest Browse All 8424

Artificial intelligence, due process, and scientific evidence; Renowned Duke Law Professor Brandon Garrett, author of of 'Defending Due Process: Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World,' presents at an internet discussion sponsored by the NACDL (National Association of Criminal Defence Lawyers, to be held on Friday April 18th, 3.30 to 5.30 PM ET. (It's free! I have enrolled under the 'international category): Much to learn, For good or for bad, Artificial Intelligence will provide considerable grist for this Blog's mill... Details below. HL.

Previous: Isoke Robinson: Detroit: Technology: Licence plate reader: Flawed technology? Flawed policing! (Bad combination! HL): Once again, Detroit police have falsely accused a Black woman of a crime using the city’s multimillion dollar high-tech surveillance program — this time resulting in a $35,000 settlement, Atlanta Black Star reports, in a story headed, 'Wouldn't Stop Crying': At Least 10 Detroit Cops Wrongly Raid Black Woman's Home with Guns Drawn, Detain Her Toddler Over License Plate Reader Error."…"The incident is the latest in a long line of similar incidents that have taken place in Detroit and around the country where technology like face recognition wrongly implicate Black people 35 percent of the time, according to a 2018 ACLU study…"The cops were investigating a drive-by shooting that had taken place earlier that day but when speaking to witnesses, they were told the shots came from a white Dodge Charger but did not even give police a partial license number, the Detroit Free Press reported. Without a license plate number, police began working backwards, reviewing city license plate readers to see if they could spot a white Dodge Charger. The license plate reader they reviewed was two miles from the actual shooting but only two blocks from Robinson’s home and that was enough “evidence” for police to terrorize Robinson and her child. Furthermore, witnesses told police that the Dodge Charger involved in the shooting had only one working fog light. However, police never bothered to test the fog lights in Robinson’s car or check it for gunpowder residue during the entire three weeks they had it in their possession, according to testimony from Detective Corbin. And the man later convicted for the non-fatal drive-by shooting had no known connection to Robinson or her car."


  • Date: Friday, April 18th, 2025
  • Time: 3:30 – 5:00 pm ET | 12:30 – 2:00 pm PT
  • Cost: FREE, but registration is required
  • CLE: No CLE is being offered for this program..
——————————————————————————————

THE DISCUSSION: "AI, Due Process, and Scientific Evidence." Posted on April 1, 2025. By Sarah Olson. (Forensic Resources);


"NACDL invites you to join us for a discussion exploring Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the criminal legal system featuring Duke Law Professor Brandon Garrett, author of Defending Due Process: Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World. The presentation will be followed by a Q&A session led by NACDL President-Elect, Andrew Birrell.

AI is increasingly used to make important decisions that affect individuals, including in criminal justice settings. Due process rights are typically heightened in criminal cases, in which a person’s life, liberty, and public safety can be at stake. In criminal investigations, uses of AI have proliferated in areas such as: DNA mixture interpretation; facial recognition; recidivism risk assessments; and predictive policing. The program will discuss four issues that arise in these settings:

  • Whether due process ensures some access to discovery and information concerning how those technologies work, in criminal cases
  • Whether the AI is interpretable, or whether the factors and weights that it relies on is available to lawyers and judges
  • Reliability-related questions about whether the AI has been scientifically tested, and if so, what is the research available concerning its reliability and performance 
  • Whether under Daubert and related rules regarding experts, whether experts may testify about those types of technology.
  • Date: Friday, April 18th, 2025
  • Time: 3:30 – 5:00 pm ET | 12:30 – 2:00 pm PT
  • Cost: FREE, but registration is required
  • CLE: No CLE is being offered for this program.

Register Now


*Note: To encourage open discussion and dialogue, we will be following the Chatham House Rule. This allows attendees, including media representatives, to use the information shared during the program, but they cannot reveal the identity or affiliation of the speaker. For any questions regarding this policy, please contact Bonnie Hoffman, NACDL Director of Public Defense. 


Presenters:

Brandon L. Garrett, L. Neil Williams, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Law, Duke University School of Law

Brandon L. Garrett, a leading scholar of criminal justice outcomes, evidence, and constitutional rights, is the inaugural L. Neil Williams, Jr. Professor of Law and director of the Wilson Center for Science and Justice at Duke Law, an initiative that brings together faculty and students to improve criminal justice outcomes.

Garrett’s current research and teaching interests focus on evidence, forensic science, constitutional rights, habeas corpus, corporate crime, and criminal law. He is the author of six books: Autopsy of a Crime Lab: Exposing the Flaws in Forensics (University of California Press, March 2021); The Death Penalty: Concepts and Insights (West Academic, 2018) (with Lee Kovarsky); End of its Rope: How Killing the Death Penalty Can Revive Criminal Justice (Harvard University Press, 2017); Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations (Harvard University Press, 2014); Federal Habeas Corpus: Executive Detention and Post-Conviction Litigation (Foundation Press, 2013) (with Lee Kovarsky); and Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong (Harvard University Press, 2011). These books have been translated for editions in China, Spain, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. For more information, visit Garrett’s website.

In addition to numerous articles published in leading law reviews and scientific journals, Garrett’s work has been widely cited by courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, lower federal courts, state supreme courts, and courts in other countries. Garrett also frequently speaks about criminal justice matters before legislative and policymaking bodies, groups of practicing lawyers, law enforcement, and to local and national media. He has been involved with a number of law and science reform initiatives, including the American Law Institute’s project on policing, for which he serves as Associate Reporter, and a National Academy of Sciences Committee concerning eyewitness evidence. Garrett serves as co-director of CSAFE (Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence.) He also serves as the court-appointed monitor in the ODonnell v. Harris County misdemeanor bail reform consent decree. 
Garrett maintains online data sets relating to his research. These include:

Garrett received his BA in 1997 from Yale University. He received his JD in 2001 from Columbia Law School, where he was an articles editor of the Columbia Law Review and a Kent Scholar. After graduating, he clerked for the Hon. Pierre N. Leval of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and then worked as an associate at Neufeld, Scheck & Brustin LLP in New York City. Before joining Duke Law in 2018, Garrett was the White Burkett Miller Professor of Law and Public Affairs and Justice Thurgood Marshall Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. In 2015, he was a Visiting Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford University.

Register Now

Andrew S. Birrell, President Elect, NACDL

Andy Birrell is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers—an honor limited to the top 1% of lawyers in the State. He is a Fellow of the American Board of Criminal Lawyers. He is the former Chairperson of the Minnesota State Bar Association Criminal Law Certification Board and was the first lawyer in Minnesota to be certified by the Minnesota State Bar Association as a Board Certified Criminal Law Specialist. Andy is a Board Certified Criminal Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy. He is a past President of the Minnesota Association of Criminal Lawyers. In addition to being selected a perennial Super Lawyer, he has four times been named one of Minnesota’s Top 100 Super Lawyers most recently in 2022. Andy is the second Vice President of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. He also is the Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the NACDL Foundation for Criminal Defense.

Andy represents clients in all phases of criminal law and related matters from grand jury investigations through appeals in federal and state courts throughout the United States. He represents clients in matters implicating the most significant and difficult white collar criminal law matters, including those involving: RICO, money laundering, conspiracy, tax charges, mail and wire fraud, bank fraud and other related allegations.

Andy is an accomplished and seasoned appellate lawyer. He has argued before the United States Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., has successfully argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit and has won reversals of convictions and orders for new trials in the Minnesota Court of Appeals and Supreme Court.

Register Now


Resources:

The entire post can be read at:

https://forensicresources.org/2025/ai-due-process-and-scientific-evidence/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ai-due-process-and-scientific-evidence


PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985


———————————————————————————————


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

----------------------------------------------------------------

Viewing latest article 17
Browse Latest Browse All 8424

Trending Articles